Remember we are talking about LYME (Borrelia Burgdorferi) ONLY! Not other tick borne disease such as Babesia, Myomoto or the 32 known species of Borrelia.
The CDC recommends that the Lyme Western Blot be performed only when there is a positive or equivocal Lyme ELISA.
Yet 30% of patients with a CDC positive Lyme Western Blot have negative ELISA test.
Conclusion: The standard ‘Lyme screen’ or ELISA test is a poor screening test.
From CDC:
It was recommended that an IgM immunoblot be considered positive if two of the following three bands are present: 24 kDa (OspC) * , 39 kDa (BmpA), and 41 kDa (Fla) (1). It was further recommended that an that IgG immunoblot be considered positive if five of the following 10 bands are present: 18 kDa, 21 kDa (OspC) *, 28 kDa, 30 kDa, 39 kDa (BmpA), 41 kDa (Fla), 45 kDa, 58 kDa (not GroEL), 66 kDa, and 93 kDa (2).
There are nine known (LYME) Borrelia burgdorferi species specific Western blot antibodies (bands): 18, 23, 31, 34, 37, 39, 83, 93
Only one of these genus specific bands is needed to confirm evidence of exposure to Borrelia burgdorferi spirochete, and confirm clinical diagnosis of Lyme disease..
Yet CDC IgM criteria includes only 3 burgdorferi species specific antibodies 18, 39 and 93.
The CDC includes non-specific cross reacting antibodies. This can lead to false positives. If Borrelia genus specific antibodies are considered, there would be no false positive.
This Make No Sense!
WHAT TO DO??
Culturing Bb is now available in blood- but it is expensive, requires large volume of blood, cultures need to grow and patient must be off antibiotics x 3 weeks.
Sensitivity 94% !!!
http://www.biomedicalreports.org/index.php?journal=bbr&page=article&op=view&path[]=98
A simple method for the detection of live Borrelia spirochaetes in human blood using classical microscopy techniques
Abstract
We have developed a simple method for the detection of live spirochaete stages in blood of patients where chronic borreliosis is suspected. Classic techniques involving phase-contrast and fluorescence microscopy are used. The method is also quite sensitive for detecting other bacteria, protists, fungi and other organisms present in blood samples. It is also useful for monitoring the effects of various antibiotics during treatment. We also present a simple hypothesis for explaining the confusion generated through the interpretation of possible stages of Borrelia seen in human blood. We hypothesize that these various stages in the blood stream are derived from secondarily infected tissues and biofilms in the body with low oxygen concentrations. Motile stages transform rapidly into cysts or sometimes penetrate other blood cells including red blood cells (RBCs). The latter are ideal hiding places for less motile stages that take advantage of the host’s RBCs blebbing-system. Less motile, morphologically different stages may be passively ejected in the blood plasma from the blebbing RBCs, more or less coated with the host’s membrane proteins which prevents detection by immunological methods.
More articles:
From University of Oslo: http://www.apollon.uio.no/english/articles/2013/2_borrelia.html
This is an excellent article: Lyme Disease: the next Decade: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3108755/